Rationale of computer-administered admissible probability measurement
Read Online
Share

Rationale of computer-administered admissible probability measurement

  • 812 Want to read
  • ·
  • 49 Currently reading

Published by Rand Corp. in Santa Monica, Calif .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Probabilities

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementEmir H. Shuford, Jr. and Thomas A. Brown
SeriesRand Corporation. Rand report -- R-1371-ARPA, R (Rand Corporation) -- R-1371-ARPA
ContributionsBrown, Thomas A. 1932-
The Physical Object
Paginationvii, 75 p. ;
Number of Pages75
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL15268343M

Download Rationale of computer-administered admissible probability measurement

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Rationale of Computer-Administered Admissible Probability Measurement. Shuford, Emir H., Jr.; Brown, Thomas A. A student's choice of an answer to a test question is a coarse measure of his knowledge about the subject matter of the by: 2. The report is part of an ongoing study of decision-theoretic psychometrics. Measurement of a student's knowledge about the subject matter of a multiple-choice. A student's choice of an answer to a test question is a coarse measure of his knowledge about the subject matter of the question. Much finer measurement might. state of knowledge on the subject. Admissible probability measurement (APM) is a testing procedure that permits a user to express his degree of certainty or uncertainty as to the correctness of his answer. The multiple choice type of test is used in the current implemen­ tation of by: 2.

  Admissible probability measurement procedures utilize scoring systems with a very special property that guarantees that any student, at whatever level of knowledge or skill, can maximize his expected score if and only if he honestly reflects his degree-of-belief by: The admissible estimation of the unknown mean of a stationary process with rational spectral density Chapter (PDF Available) January with 7 Reads How we measure 'reads'. Admissible probability measurement scoring procedure described removes the constraint of forced choices, where guesses are based on partial knowledge, . Abstract. A student's choice of an answer to a test question is a coarse measure of his knowledge about the subject matter of the question. Much finer measurement might be achieved if the student were asked to estimate, for each possible answer, the probability that it is the correct by:

GACE Mathematics Assessment Study Companion 9. Note: After clicking on a link, right click and select “Previous View” to go back to original text. E. Knows how to analyze both precision and accuracy in measurement situations • Chooses a level of accuracy appropriate to limitations on measurement when reporting quantitiesFile Size: 1MB. Enduring Understandings and Essential Questions Mathematics K Wallingford Public Schools Organization is based on the current State Frameworks in Mathematics. The parentheses indicate the proposed structure for the revision of the Math Frameworks. Enduring . Jon Williamson, in Philosophy of Mathematics, 9 BAYESIANISM. The Bayesian interpretation of probability also deals with probability functions defined over single-case variables. But in this case the interpretation is mental rather than physical: probabilities are interpreted as an agent's rational degrees of belief. 10 Thus for an agent, P(B = yes) = q if and only if the agent believes. Ilkka Niiniluoto, in Handbook of the History of Logic, 11 Machine Learning. Besides expected verisimiltude ver, other ways of combining closeness to the truth and epistemic probability include the concepts of probable verisimilitude (i.e., the probability given e that g is truthlike at least to a given degree) and probable approximate truth (i.e., the probability given e that g is.